본문 바로가기

English Bolg

Clearing the Charges of Digital Interference

Attorney Taejin Kim

K&P Law Firm, Songdo, Incheon, South Korea

 

K&P recently secured a crucial victory, attaining an acquittal in a case involving accusations of computer-related business obstruction.

 

The defendant, referred to as 'A', is a smartphone application developer known for creating a streamlined food delivery service app, which allows users to expedite their orders. However, 'A' found himself in legal hot water when 'X', another delivery app developer, levied accusations that 'A's' application was causing disruptions to the functionality of their own app. Consequently, these claims triggered a lawsuit, initiated by the prosecution, against 'A'.

 

The crux of the case for 'X' rested on the following premises:

 

1. 'A' had designed a "supporter program", a program that automates the process of securing orders by repeatedly clicking on a specific order or location.

2. 'A's' application was allegedly built to circumvent the rules set up by 'X's' delivery app, which assigns delivery requests based on certain criteria.

3. 'X's' app was structured to distribute orders fairly among delivery drivers by imposing various constraints on the visibility of orders, such as limiting them to short-distance deliveries. Yet, 'A's' program was claimed to be built to bypass these limitations.

 

In response to these accusations, K&P embarked on a rigorous fact-finding mission, collaborating with the Cyber Investigation Division of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office among other methods, and substantiated the following points:

 

1. 'A's' app lacks the capacity to override or circumvent the business rules of 'X's' app.

2. 'A's' app cannot access information that is not already available to the users of 'X's' app.

3. 'A's' app doesn't possess the ability to receive orders ahead of 'X's' app.

4. 'A's' app operates within permissible parameters.

5. 'A's' app isn't a "supporter program" with single-touch functionality.

6. 'A's' app doesn't infringe on 'X's' server.

7. 'A's' app essentially represents a decompiled version of 'X's' application.

8. 'A's' app was developed using Android's open-source code, ensuring its operations are within the bounds set by the Android operating system.

 

Following a thorough examination of K&P's robust rebuttals, the court sided with the defense and exonerated Mr. 'A' from the charges.

 

The verdict of this case stands as an important milestone in the rapidly evolving sphere of technology law. As our digital interactions continue to increase, so too does the necessity for clear legal guidelines that can adequately address the potential for disputes in this space.

 

In the dispute between 'A' and 'X', the question of whether a smartphone application could be designed in such a way as to interfere with another's operation was brought to the forefront. The accusations made by 'X' against 'A' were serious, suggesting that 'A's' app was not only built to bypass 'X's' delivery app's rules, but also to exploit these rules to the detriment of 'X's' business.

 

However, K&P successfully disproved these allegations, establishing that 'A's' app didn't have the capacity to manipulate or override 'X's' app's rules. Furthermore, we demonstrated that 'A's' app didn't have any unique access to information, nor did it have the ability to receive orders ahead of 'X's' app.

 

In essence, K&P was able to illustrate that 'A's' app was simply a well-crafted tool developed within the framework of the Android operating system's open-source code, providing a valuable service to its users without infringing on the rights or operations of other applications.

 

The court's decision to acquit 'A' underscores the importance of thorough investigation and fact-checking in such cases. It also serves as a reminder that, as we navigate the ever-changing landscape of digital technology, legal professionals must continually evolve and adapt to ensure that justice is served.

 

The verdict of this case not only exonerated 'A' from the charges, but also set a valuable precedent in the field of technology law. It serves as a testament to the commitment of K&P to uphold the principles of justice and fairness, even in the most complex and evolving areas of law.

 

At K&P, we remain dedicated to providing our clients with the best legal counsel, especially in cases where the intersection of technology and law creates new challenges. As we continue to break new ground in this exciting area of law, we are proud to stand by our clients and ensure their rights are protected.

 

===

Tel. +82 32 864 8300

Email: info@kimnpark.com

Please Visit our Website: 

www.kimnpark.com

사업자 정보 표시
법무법인 케이앤피 | 김태진 | 인천 연수구 인천타워대로 323, B동 2901호(송도동, 센트로드) | 사업자 등록번호 : 121-86-29502 | TEL : 032-864-8300 | Mail : info@kimnpark.com | 통신판매신고번호 : 호 | 사이버몰의 이용약관 바로가기