본문 바로가기

English Bolg

Derivative Lawsuit - Successful Case for Return of Executive Compensation K&P Law Firm has achieved a victory in a derivative lawsuit where shareholder X (hereinafter "Plaintiff") filed a compensation return claim against CEO A (hereinafter "Defendant") on behalf of Company Y.   According to Article 388 of the Commercial Act, a director of a corporation can only receive compensation if it is determined by either the articles of incorporation or a resolution of the sha.. 더보기
Case Victory - Claim for Unjust Enrichment of a Promissory Note K&P Law Firm Wins a Lawsuit on Behalf of Defendant X in a Claim for Unjust Enrichment of a Promissory NoteBelow is a detailed explanation of the unjust enrichment claim. 1. Basic FactsThe plaintiff had planned to construct an art museum in Sabuk-myeon, Chuncheon City, and on March 29, 2012, entered into a contract for the construction of the museum (hereinafter referred to as "the Contract") wit.. 더보기
Not Guilty in Trade Secret Leak Case 1. Summary of the Indictment     The defendants joined the victim company and worked as team leader and manager in the System Development Team of the Technology Research Institute, responsible for designing automated equipment for smartphone camera modules. They later resigned from the victim company. Subsequently, the defendants joined Company A, where they worked as deputy directors in the Sy.. 더보기
Developers of Auxiliary App for Delivery Riders' Convenience Acquitted in Both First Instance and Appeal K&P Law Firm successfully defended app developers who created and distributed an auxiliary application to enhance the usability of delivery apps used by riders. The defendants were acquitted in both the first instance and appellate courts.   Indictment Summary:   The victim company, R Corp., developed and operated an application called "Live As Is" for food delivery services. The app distributes.. 더보기
Case of Returning CEO's Salary and Corporate Card Usage to the Company Through a Shareholder Derivative Suit K&P Law Firm successfully represented shareholder X of Company A in a lawsuit that compelled CEO Y to return all compensation (including monthly salary, bonuses, and all other forms) and corporate card usage amounts to Company A.   Additionally, Z, who was the auditor of Company A, was held jointly liable and ordered to return Y's compensation to Company A in solidarity with Y.   1. Case Overvie.. 더보기
Privileges and Immunities of GCF Staff - Especially those working in Korea Attorney Taejin KimK&P Law FirmInternational Business District, Songdo, Incheon  Privileges and Immunities of GCF Staff The Green Climate Fund (GCF) staff are awarded certain privileges and immunities to ensure the independent and effective operation of the Fund. These privileges and immunities are designed to protect the Fund from being subject to the jurisdiction of the countries where it oper.. 더보기
Public Representations by Administrative Agencies and the Principle of Protection of Legitimate Expectations (Consultation Case) K&P Law Firm recently advised a company that it could receive substantial financial support from a local government. The main basis for this advice was the principle of protection of legitimate expectations under administrative law. The case involved a situation where the company started a business believing in the local government's promise of support, but the local government did not provide t.. 더보기
Successful Overturning of a Garnishment and Collection Order: K&P Law Firm Case Study On Behalf of the Applicant, K&P Secures Judgment Overturning a Debt Garnishment and Collection Order On behalf of our client Corporation X, K&P Law Firm achieved a significant victory by obtaining a judgment that overturned a debt garnishment and collection order, which had been levied against the client's rights to retrieve deposited funds. Case Summary 1. On July 27, 2005, A and B completed a .. 더보기